Wednesday, September 12, 2012 – Geometry Lessons
Somewhere in time, many, many years ago – not as far back as
when dinosaurs roamed the earth, but more like the days of flower children in
bellbottoms and tie-dyed t-shirts – I took a geometry class. This was when I lived on Long Island. Now, I was never a math
enthusiast. In fact, I took as
little math as possible, in both high school and college. In fact, in college, I took absolutely
no math – zero, nada.
As far as I remember, I wasn’t bad at math; I just had no
interest in it. I couldn’t see the
point of it. The same was true for
science, by the way, whereas history, literature, and foreign language were a
different story. I felt right at
home in those disciplines. But
back to the matter at hand today, which is geometry.
I pity my poor math teachers back in West Hempstead Junior
and Senior High Schools, trying to teach such a reluctant student a subject
dear to their hearts. I have vague
recollections of words such as function, equation, slope, angle, tangent. But really, whatever math knowledge I
acquired so long ago was buried deep in my brain, below the iambic
pentameters.
So it was a big challenge when I sat down a couple of days
ago to work on Elliott’s idea for the next series of paintings and had to
dredge up some of those long forgotten factoids. Specifically, I had to recall what I’d learned about geometric
forms. Sitting at the drawing
table, I studied his rough sketch of embedded cubes within cubes. I even dug up some graph paper and a
protractor. And amazingly, I
figured out how to generate a mathematically correct template for the image he
wants to use. I hereby offer
humble and belated thanks to my math teachers of yore.
After this accomplishment, we worked together in the studio yesterday,
focusing on composition and color.
We’re now set to start the actual painting. This will be my execution of Elliott’s vision. (I already have several ideas of my own,
but they can wait.)
In celebration of geometry, I went into DC today to see an
exhibition of geometric abstraction at the museum of the OAS (Organization of
American States). It was my first
visit there, and the interior of the building was as impressive as the artwork
in the exhibit. Painters from
across Central and South America were represented in the show. A quotation attributed to the artist
Omar Rayo of Colombia immediately struck me: “Discovering geometry is to reconcile myself with life. Unhappiness is the product of chaos.” Elliott can probably identify with that
sentiment. I’m not so sure I would
agree, however.
The second exhibition I saw today was more in keeping with
my own approach to art. It was an
exhibition of Richard Diebenkorn’s Ocean Park series at the Corcoran Gallery ofArt. I’d been anticipating this
one all summer, based only on the limited exposure I’ve had to Diebenkorn’s
work. In the light and airy
galleries of the Corcoran, the large scale canvases found a perfect home. (Unfortunately, no photography was
allowed, but I doubt if I could have captured the special qualities of
Diebenkorn’s paintings with my little camera anyway.)
I simply loved these paintings – the drips, the scribbles,
the translucent layers, the scrubbed over areas, all were evidence of the
artist’s hand and the process of creation. Geometric elements merged with organic elements. Even straight lines weren’t hard-edged
but had a hand-wrought quality. Spontaneity,
messiness, life, energy, dynamism – all came to mind when I looked at
Diebenkorn’s work, which included prints, drawings, and cigar box lids in
addition to the large-scale canvases.
Unlike Elliott’s work, these were not figured out ahead of
time. Rather, they incorporated
the passage of time because the viewer could see how they evolved during the
process of painting. To quote from
the description beside one of the paintings, Diebenkorn was involved in a
“search for ‘rightness,’ an attempt to solve complex and often self-imposed compositional
and spatial problems, to welcome mistakes, push through objections and
self-doubt, and reach a balanced outcome.”
How exciting, how liberating! It made me want to rush back to the studio and get to
work. But first – lunch. Although the Corcoran has a good café,
I wanted to get outside and enjoy the glorious sunshine and the saturated
colors of this September day. The
sidewalks surrounding Farragut Square were clogged with office workers lined up
at the food carts. Although the
offerings looked tempting – Mexican, Afghan, and Korean specialities, to name
just a few – I kept going. Even
Paul Bakery, with its French fare, didn’t tempt me. I’d been dreaming of a simple bento box lunch, so I marched
back down to Teaism on H Street. I
capped off a salmon bento box (teriyaki salmon, gingery cucumber salad, sesame broccoli, brown rice with seaweed) with Teaism’s signature dessert, their
swoon-inducing salty oat cookie.
Believe me, that cookie was worth the major investment of calories. I walked back to the Metro in a state
of bliss.
No comments:
Post a Comment